Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $44899 | XFX $35999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1410 MHz | 2150 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 0 | 2560 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 1 | 3 |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | FreeSync |
GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 0 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 204 mm | 323 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 12 Gbps | 18 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Series | GeForce GTX 1650 G6 | Radeon RX 6000 |
Slot Size | 3 | 3 |
TDP | 75W | 250W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | FSR 3.1 |
VRAM | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Part Number | TUF-GTX1650-O4GD6-GAMING90YV0EH0-M0NA00 | RX-675XYJFDP |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the TUF GAMING OC vs Speedster QICK 319 Core reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Speedster QICK 319 Core is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $89 (25%) less than the TUF GAMING OC.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Speedster QICK 319 Core has the advantage with 8GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the TUF GAMING OC, which is significantly shorter.