Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $37500 | XFX $35999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1530 MHz | 2150 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1830 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | - | 2560 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 3 |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | FreeSync |
GPU | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 0 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 247 mm | 323 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 14 Gbps | 18 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Series | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Radeon RX 6000 |
Slot Size | 2 | 3 |
TDP | 125W | 250W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | FSR 3.1 |
VRAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
Part Number | GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING X GEFORCE GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING X V375-282R G166SGX | RX-675XYJFDP |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the GAMING X vs Speedster QICK 319 Core reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
Both components are priced similarly, making the choice dependent on specific features rather than budget.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Speedster QICK 319 Core has the advantage with 6GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the GAMING X, which is significantly shorter.