Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $19499 |  $14498 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2050 MHz | 1750 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2050 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
Color | - | Blue |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 1 Fan |
CUDA Cores | 3584 | 0 |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | GSYNC |
GPU | Arc A750 | Arc A310 |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 0 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 250 mm | 156 mm |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Series | Arc A750 | Arc A310 |
Slot Size | 2 | 1 |
TDP | 225W | 50W |
VRAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Part Number | 99AM3D 21P02J00BA | SA310C-4G 1A1-S00401900G |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Limited Edition vs ECO reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The ECO is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $50 (34%) less than the Limited Edition.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Limited Edition has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the ECO, which is significantly shorter.