Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $33100 | XFX $35999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2685 MHz | 2150 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2825 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
Color | - | Black |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 1024 | 2560 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 0 | 3 |
DisplayPort 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 0 |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync |
GPU | Radeon RX 6500 XT | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 1 |
Bus | - | PCIe x16 |
Length | 172 mm | 323 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | - | 18 Gbps |
Memory Clock | 18 | 0 |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 6-Pin | 1 | 0 |
Series | Mech | Radeon RX 6000 |
Slot Size | 2 | 3 |
TDP | 107W | 250W |
Upscaling | - | FSR 3.1 |
VRAM | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Part Number | - | RX-675XYJFDP |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the MECH 2X OC vs Speedster QICK 319 Core reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The MECH 2X OC is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $29 (9%) less than the Speedster QICK 319 Core.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Speedster QICK 319 Core has the advantage with 8GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the MECH 2X OC, which is significantly shorter.