Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU | ![]() $1,08500 | ![]() $44468 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1825 MHz | 1626 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2365 MHz | 2491 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 2 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 5120 | 1792 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 3 |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync |
GPU | Radeon RX 6900 XT | Radeon RX 6600 |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 0 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | - |
Length | 310 mm | 193 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 16 Gbps | - |
Memory Clock | 0 | 1750 |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 6-Pin | 1 | 0 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 2 | 1 |
Series | Radeon RX 6000 | Radeon RX 6000 |
Slot Size | 3 | 0 |
TDP | 363W | 140W |
Upscaling | FSR 3.1 | FSR 3.1 |
VRAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Part Number | 11308-03-20G | 11310-01-20G |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the NITRO+ SE vs PULSE reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The PULSE is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $640 (144%) less than the NITRO+ SE.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the NITRO+ SE has the advantage with 8GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the PULSE, which is significantly shorter.
