Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $25200 | $86281 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1040 MHz | 1920 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1492 MHz | 2625 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | White |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | - | 5888 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 1 | 3 |
Frame Gen | - | DLSS Frame Generation |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | GSYNC |
GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 2 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 2 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 189 mm | 307 mm |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
PCIe 12VHPWR | 0 | 1 |
Series | GeForce RTX 30 | GeForce RTX 40 |
Slot Size | 2 | 3 |
TDP | 70W | 215W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
Part Number | RTX 3050 VENTUS 2X E 6G OC GeForce RTX 3050 VENTUS 2X E 6G OC V812-055R 3050VENTUS 2XE6GOC 912-V812-056 | RTX 4070 GAMING X SLIM WHITE 12GGeForce RTX 4070 GAMING X SLIM WHITE 12G912-V513-274V513-274R |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the VENTUS 2X E OC vs GAMING X SLIM reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The VENTUS 2X E OC is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $611 (242%) less than the GAMING X SLIM.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the GAMING X SLIM has the advantage with 6GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the VENTUS 2X E OC, which is significantly shorter.