Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $4,29999 |  $4,29999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2010 MHz | 2010 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2625 MHz | 2655 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 21760 | 21760 |
DisplayPort 2.1 Outputs | 3 | 0 |
DisplayPort 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 3 |
Frame Gen | DLSS Multi Frame Generation | DLSS Multi Frame Generation |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | GSYNC |
GPU | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 329 mm | 360 mm |
Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
Series | GeForce RTX 50 | GeForce RTX 50 |
Slot Size | 4 | 4 |
TDP | 600W | 575W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
Part Number | VCG509032TFXXPB1-O | GV-N5090AORUS M-32GD |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the EPIC-X RGB OC vs AORUS MASTER reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
Builders with compact cases should consider the EPIC-X RGB OC, which is significantly shorter.