Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $51999 |  $47500 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2410 MHz | 1923 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2410 MHz | 1923 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
Color | Black | - |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 1 Fan |
CUDA Cores | 4608 | 768 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 0 | 1 |
DisplayPort 2.1 Outputs | 3 | 0 |
Displayport 21b Outputs | 3 | - |
Frame Gen | DLSS Multi Frame Generation | - |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | FreeSync |
GPU | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | Radeon RX 6400 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 247 mm | 162 mm |
Memory Clock | 2662 | 0 |
Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
Series | GeForce RTX 50 | Radeon RX 6000 |
Slot Size | 3 | 2 |
TDP | 180W | 53W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | FSR 3.1 |
VRAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Part Number | RTX 5060 Ti 8G GAMING OC G506T-8GC | RX6400 CLI 4G 90-GA3CZZ-00UANF |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the GAMING OC vs Challenger ITX reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Challenger ITX is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $45 (9%) less than the GAMING OC.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the GAMING OC has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the Challenger ITX, which is significantly shorter.