Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $51999 |  $44899 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2410 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2410 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 2 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 4608 | 0 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 0 | 1 |
DisplayPort 2.1 Outputs | 3 | 0 |
Displayport 21b Outputs | 3 | - |
Frame Gen | DLSS Multi Frame Generation | - |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | GSYNC |
GPU | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti | GeForce GTX 1650 |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 0 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 247 mm | 204 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | - | 12 Gbps |
Memory Clock | 2662 | 0 |
Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
Series | GeForce RTX 50 | GeForce GTX 1650 G6 |
Slot Size | 3 | 3 |
TDP | 180W | 75W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Part Number | RTX 5060 Ti 8G GAMING OC G506T-8GC | TUF-GTX1650-O4GD6-GAMING90YV0EH0-M0NA00 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the GAMING OC vs TUF GAMING OC reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The TUF GAMING OC is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $71 (16%) less than the GAMING OC.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the GAMING OC has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the TUF GAMING OC, which is significantly shorter.