Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $19999 |  $25200 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1700 MHz | 1040 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2000 MHz | 1492 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | Intel | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 2 Fans |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 0 | 1 |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | GSYNC |
GPU | Arc A580 | GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 2 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 0 | 2 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 271 mm | 189 mm |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Series | Arc A580 | GeForce RTX 30 |
Slot Size | 3 | 2 |
TDP | 175W | 70W |
Upscaling | - | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Part Number | A580 CL 8GO 90-GA3JZZ-00UANF | RTX 3050 VENTUS 2X E 6G OC GeForce RTX 3050 VENTUS 2X E 6G OC V812-055R 3050VENTUS 2XE6GOC 912-V812-056 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Challenger OC vs VENTUS 2X E OC reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Challenger OC is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $52 (26%) less than the VENTUS 2X E OC.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Challenger OC has the advantage with 2GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the VENTUS 2X E OC, which is significantly shorter.