Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $1,99800 |  $1,41638 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1260 MHz | 2685 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1830 MHz | 2670 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | - |
Cooling | 240 mm Radiator | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 0 | 4352 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 3 |
Frame Gen | - | DLSS Frame Generation |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | GSYNC |
GPU | GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 3 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 0 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | - |
Length | 252 mm | 338 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 19 Gbps | - |
Memory Clock | 0 | 18 |
Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 2 | 1 |
Series | GeForce RTX 30 | GeForce RTX 40 |
Slot Size | 2 | 2 |
TDP | 350W | 160W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Part Number | GV-N3080AORUSX W-12GD | - |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the AORUS XTREME WATERFORCE vs GAMING X TRIO reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The GAMING X TRIO is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $582 (41%) less than the AORUS XTREME WATERFORCE.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the AORUS XTREME WATERFORCE has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the AORUS XTREME WATERFORCE, which is significantly shorter.