Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $1,14636 |  $2,25999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1825 MHz | 2375 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2340 MHz | 2525 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
Color | Grey | - |
Cooling | 3 Fans | Water Cooled |
CUDA Cores | 5120 | 5120 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 2 |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync |
GPU | Radeon RX 6900 XT | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 2 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 0 | 2 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | - |
Length | 324 mm | 282 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 16 Gbps | 16 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 0 | 3 |
Series | Radeon RX 6000 | AORUS |
Slot Size | 3 | 0 |
TDP | 300W | 0W |
Upscaling | FSR 3.1 | - |
VRAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Part Number | RX 6900 XT GAMING X TRIO 16G Radeon RX 6900 XT GAMING X TRIO 16G V395-007R | - |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the GAMING X TRIO vs AORUS XTREME WATERFORCE reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The GAMING X TRIO is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $1114 (97%) less than the AORUS XTREME WATERFORCE.
Builders with compact cases should consider the AORUS XTREME WATERFORCE, which is significantly shorter.