Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $1,13340 |  $33200 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2310 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2685 MHz | 1755 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 2 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 4352 | - |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 1 |
Frame Gen | DLSS Frame Generation | - |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | GSYNC |
GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 0 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 250 mm | 202 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 18 Gbps | 12 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 1 | 0 |
Series | GeForce RTX 40 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
Slot Size | 2 | 2 |
TDP | 160W | 100W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Part Number | NE6406TT19P1-1060D | 04G-P4-1357-KR |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Dual OC vs SC ULTRA GAMING reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The SC ULTRA GAMING is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $801 (241%) less than the Dual OC.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Dual OC has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the SC ULTRA GAMING, which is significantly shorter.