Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $64700 |  $33200 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1690 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1945 MHz | 1755 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
Color | - | Black |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 2 Fans |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 1 |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | GSYNC |
GPU | Radeon RX 5700 XT | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 1 | 1 |
Bus | - | PCIe x16 |
Length | 254 mm | 202 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 14 Gbps | 12 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 6-Pin | 1 | 0 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 1 | 0 |
Series | Radeon RX 5000 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
Slot Size | 0 | 2 |
TDP | 225W | 100W |
Upscaling | FSR 3.1 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Part Number | - | 04G-P4-1357-KR |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the XT EVOKE OC vs SC ULTRA GAMING reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The SC ULTRA GAMING is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $315 (95%) less than the XT EVOKE OC.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the XT EVOKE OC has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the SC ULTRA GAMING, which is significantly shorter.