Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $30799 |  $33200 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2331 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2580 MHz | 1755 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
Color | Blue | Black |
Cooling | 1 Fan | 2 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 1792 | - |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 4 | 1 |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | GSYNC |
GPU | Radeon PRO W6600 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 0 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 202 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 14 Gbps | 12 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 6-Pin | 1 | 0 |
Series | Radeon PRO W6600 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
Slot Size | 1 | 2 |
TDP | 120W | 100W |
Upscaling | - | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Part Number | 100-506208 100-506159 | 04G-P4-1357-KR |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Radeon PRO W6600 vs SC ULTRA GAMING reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Radeon PRO W6600 is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $24 (8%) less than the SC ULTRA GAMING.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Radeon PRO W6600 has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the SC ULTRA GAMING, which is significantly shorter.