Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $30799 |  $14498 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2331 MHz | 1750 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2580 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
Color | Blue | Blue |
Cooling | 1 Fan | 1 Fan |
CUDA Cores | 1792 | 0 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 4 | 0 |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | GSYNC |
GPU | Radeon PRO W6600 | Arc A310 |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 0 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 156 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 14 Gbps | - |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 6-Pin | 1 | 0 |
Series | Radeon PRO W6600 | Arc A310 |
Slot Size | 1 | 1 |
TDP | 120W | 50W |
VRAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Part Number | 100-506208 100-506159 | SA310C-4G 1A1-S00401900G |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Radeon PRO W6600 vs ECO reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The ECO is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $163 (112%) less than the Radeon PRO W6600.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Radeon PRO W6600 has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the ECO, which is significantly shorter.