Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $30799 | XFX $35999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2331 MHz | 2150 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2580 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
Color | Blue | Black |
Cooling | 1 Fan | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 1792 | 2560 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 4 | 3 |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync |
GPU | Radeon PRO W6600 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 0 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 323 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 14 Gbps | 18 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 6-Pin | 1 | 0 |
Series | Radeon PRO W6600 | Radeon RX 6000 |
Slot Size | 1 | 3 |
TDP | 120W | 250W |
Upscaling | - | FSR 3.1 |
VRAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Part Number | 100-506208 100-506159 | RX-675XYJFDP |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Radeon PRO W6600 vs Speedster QICK 319 Core reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Radeon PRO W6600 is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $52 (17%) less than the Speedster QICK 319 Core.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Speedster QICK 319 Core has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the Radeon PRO W6600, which is significantly shorter.