Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $4,81451 |  $4,01298 |
|---|---|---|
Ai Tops | - | 3352 |
Base Clock | 1350 MHz | - |
Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 2730 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 5.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Color | Gold | Red |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 4 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 0 | 21760 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | - |
Displayport 21b Outputs | - | 3 |
Frame Gen | - | DLSS Multi Frame Generation |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | GSYNC |
GPU | Titan RTX | GeForce RTX 5090 |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 1 | - |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 0 | 2 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 370.3 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 14 Gbps | 28 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
PCIe 12V-2x6 | 0 | 1 |
Series | TITAN RTX | GeForce RTX 50 |
Slot Size | 2 | 3.9 |
TDP | 280W | 800W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | DLSS 4.5 |
Vendor Oc Clock | - | 2760 MHz |
VRAM | 24 GB | 32 GB |
Width | - | 150.5 mm |
Part Number | 900-1G150-2500-000 SB 900-1G150-2500-000 | MTX5090P32G30TH |
Newegg — Check |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Titan RTX vs ROG Matrix Platinum reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The ROG Matrix Platinum is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $802 (20%) less than the Titan RTX.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the ROG Matrix Platinum has the advantage with 8GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the Titan RTX, which is significantly shorter.