Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $25900 |  $1,99500 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1730 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1980 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
Color | - | Black |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 1 Fan |
CUDA Cores | - | 10496 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 2 |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | GSYNC |
GPU | Radeon RX 5700 XT | GeForce RTX 3090 |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 1 | 2 |
Bus | - | PCIe x16 |
Length | 297 mm | 267 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | - | 20 Gbps |
Memory Clock | 14 | 0 |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
PCIe 8-Pin | 2 | 2 |
Series | Radeon RX 5000 | GeForce RTX 30 |
Slot Size | 0 | 2 |
TDP | 225W | 350W |
Upscaling | FSR 3.1 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Part Number | - | GV-N3090TURBO-24GD |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the GAMING X vs TURBO reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The GAMING X is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $1736 (670%) less than the TURBO.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the TURBO has the advantage with 16GB more VRAM.