Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU | XFX $32000 |  $25900 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1875 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2655 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 1 Fan |
CUDA Cores | 2048 | - |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 0 | 1 |
DisplayPort 2.1 Outputs | 3 | 0 |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | GSYNC |
GPU | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 0 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 168 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 18 Gbps | 14 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Series | Radeon RX 7000 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
Slot Size | 2 | 2 |
TDP | 165W | 125W |
Upscaling | FSR 3.1 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Part Number | RX-76PSWFTFY | VCG16606SSFPPB |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Speedster SWFT 210 Core vs VCG16606SSFPPB reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The VCG16606SSFPPB is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $61 (24%) less than the Speedster SWFT 210 Core.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Speedster SWFT 210 Core has the advantage with 2GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the VCG16606SSFPPB, which is significantly shorter.