Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $1,19500 |  $1,99500 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2310 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2730 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 1 Fan |
CUDA Cores | 7680 | 10496 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 2 |
Frame Gen | DLSS Frame Generation | - |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | GSYNC |
GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce RTX 3090 |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 0 | 2 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 0 |
Bus | - | PCIe x16 |
Length | 337 mm | 267 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | - | 20 Gbps |
Memory Clock | 1313 | 0 |
Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
PCIe 12V-2x6 | 1 | 0 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 0 | 2 |
Series | GeForce RTX 40 | GeForce RTX 30 |
Slot Size | - | 2 |
TDP | 285W | 350W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 12 GB | 24 GB |
Part Number | RTX 4070 Ti GAMING X SLIM 12G GeForce RTX 4070 Ti GAMING X SLIM 12G V513-250R | GV-N3090TURBO-24GD |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the GAMING X SLIM vs TURBO reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The GAMING X SLIM is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $800 (67%) less than the TURBO.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the TURBO has the advantage with 12GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the TURBO, which is significantly shorter.