Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $35999 | $1,04999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2317 MHz | 2520 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2587 MHz | 3060 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 2560 | 4096 |
DisplayPort 2.1 Outputs | 1 | 0 |
DisplayPort 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 2 |
Frame Gen | DLSS Multi Frame Generation | - |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | FreeSync |
GPU | GeForce RTX 5050 | Radeon RX 9070 XT |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 2 | 2 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 2 | 2 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 182 mm | 288 mm |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 1 | 0 |
Series | GeForce RTX 50 | Radeon RX 9000 |
Slot Size | 2 | 3 |
TDP | 130W | 304W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | FSR 4 |
VRAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Part Number | GV-N5050OC-8GL | GV-R9070XTGAMING OC-16GD |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the OC Low Profile vs GAMING OC reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The OC Low Profile is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $690 (192%) less than the GAMING OC.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the GAMING OC has the advantage with 8GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the OC Low Profile, which is significantly shorter.