Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $41879 | XFX $35999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2490 MHz | 2150 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2505 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
Color | - | Black |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 3072 | 2560 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | - | 3 |
DisplayPort 2.1 Outputs | 3 | 0 |
Frame Gen | DLSS Frame Generation | - |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | FreeSync |
GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 1 |
Bus | - | PCIe x16 |
Length | - | 323 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | - | 18 Gbps |
Memory Clock | 17 | 0 |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 1 | 0 |
Series | GeForce RTX 40 | Radeon RX 6000 |
Slot Size | - | 3 |
TDP | 115W | 250W |
Upscaling | - | FSR 3.1 |
VRAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Part Number | - | RX-675XYJFDP |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the OC vs Speedster QICK 319 Core reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Speedster QICK 319 Core is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $59 (16%) less than the OC.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Speedster QICK 319 Core has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.