Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $29000 | XFX $35999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 420 MHz | 2150 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1425 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 1 Fan | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 0 | 2560 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 0 | 3 |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync |
GPU | T400 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 0 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 156 mm | 323 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 10 Gbps | 18 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Series | T400 4GB | Radeon RX 6000 |
Slot Size | 1 | 3 |
TDP | 30W | 250W |
Upscaling | - | FSR 3.1 |
VRAM | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Part Number | 4X61J52234 | RX-675XYJFDP |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the T400 vs Speedster QICK 319 Core reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The T400 is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $70 (24%) less than the Speedster QICK 319 Core.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Speedster QICK 319 Core has the advantage with 8GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the T400, which is significantly shorter.