Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $2,04900 |  $2,06900 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1825 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2525 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | - |
Cooling | 360 mm Radiator + 1 Fan | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 5120 | 10496 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 3 |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | GSYNC |
GPU | Radeon RX 6900 XT | GeForce RTX 3090 |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 1 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 270 mm | 335 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 16 Gbps | - |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
PCIe 6-Pin | 1 | 0 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 2 | 0 |
Series | Radeon RX 6000 | GeForce RTX 30 |
Slot Size | 3 | 3 |
TDP | 430W | 350W |
Upscaling | FSR 3.1 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 16 GB | 24 GB |
Part Number | 11308-08-20G | RTX 3090 GAMING X TRIO 24G GeForce RTX 3090 GAMING X TRIO 24G V388-011R 912-V388-011 G3090GXT24 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Toxic Extreme Edition vs GAMING X TRIO reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
Both components are priced similarly, making the choice dependent on specific features rather than budget.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the GAMING X TRIO has the advantage with 8GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the Toxic Extreme Edition, which is significantly shorter.