Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $48199 | $45999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1040 MHz | 2220 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1477 MHz | 2220 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 0 | 2048 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 2 | 0 |
DisplayPort 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 2 |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | FreeSync |
GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 2 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 2 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 181 mm | 281 mm |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Series | GeForce RTX 30 | Radeon RX 9000 |
Slot Size | 2 | 2 |
TDP | 70W | 160W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | FSR 4 |
VRAM | 6 GB | 16 GB |
Part Number | GV-N3050OC-6GL | GV-R9060XTGAMING OC-16GD |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the OC Low Profile vs GAMING OC reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The GAMING OC is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $22 (5%) less than the OC Low Profile.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the GAMING OC has the advantage with 10GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the OC Low Profile, which is significantly shorter.