Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $48199 | XFX $35999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1040 MHz | 2150 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1477 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 0 | 2560 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 2 | 3 |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | FreeSync |
GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 2 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 2 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 181 mm | 323 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | - | 18 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Series | GeForce RTX 30 | Radeon RX 6000 |
Slot Size | 2 | 3 |
TDP | 70W | 250W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | FSR 3.1 |
VRAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
Part Number | GV-N3050OC-6GL | RX-675XYJFDP |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the OC Low Profile vs Speedster QICK 319 Core reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Speedster QICK 319 Core is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $122 (34%) less than the OC Low Profile.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Speedster QICK 319 Core has the advantage with 6GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the OC Low Profile, which is significantly shorter.