Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $27999 | XFX $34500 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1815 MHz | 2310 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2105 MHz | 2825 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
Color | - | Black |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 2 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 3840 | 1024 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 1 |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync |
GPU | Radeon RX 6800 | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 0 |
Bus | - | PCIe x16 |
Length | 300 mm | 232 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 16 Gbps | 18 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 2 | 0 |
Series | Fighter | Radeon RX 6000 |
Slot Size | 3 | 2 |
TDP | 250W | 107W |
Upscaling | - | FSR 3.1 |
VRAM | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Part Number | - | RX-65XT4DBDQ |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Fighter vs Speedster QICK 210 reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Fighter is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $65 (23%) less than the Speedster QICK 210.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Fighter has the advantage with 12GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the Speedster QICK 210, which is significantly shorter.