Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $27999 |  $35999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1815 MHz | 2317 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2105 MHz | 2587 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
Color | - | Black |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 3840 | 2560 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 0 |
DisplayPort 2.1 Outputs | 0 | 1 |
Frame Gen | - | DLSS Multi Frame Generation |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | GSYNC |
GPU | Radeon RX 6800 | GeForce RTX 5050 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 2 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 2 |
Bus | - | PCIe x16 |
Length | 300 mm | 182 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 16 Gbps | - |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 2 | 1 |
Series | Fighter | GeForce RTX 50 |
Slot Size | 3 | 2 |
TDP | 250W | 130W |
Upscaling | - | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Part Number | - | GV-N5050OC-8GL |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Fighter vs OC Low Profile reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Fighter is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $80 (29%) less than the OC Low Profile.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Fighter has the advantage with 8GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the OC Low Profile, which is significantly shorter.