Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $65500 |  $1,57999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2310 MHz | 2300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2655 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 4352 | 10752 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 0 |
DisplayPort 2.1 Outputs | 0 | 3 |
Frame Gen | DLSS Frame Generation | DLSS Multi Frame Generation |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | GSYNC |
GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce RTX 5080 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 250 mm | 303 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 18 Gbps | - |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 1 | 0 |
Series | GeForce RTX 40 | GeForce RTX 50 |
Slot Size | 2 | 3 |
TDP | 165W | 360W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Part Number | N406T2-08D6-171153N | GeForce RTX 5080 16G SHADOW 3X OC G5080-16S3C |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Twin X2 vs SHADOW 3X OC reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Twin X2 is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $925 (141%) less than the SHADOW 3X OC.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the SHADOW 3X OC has the advantage with 8GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the Twin X2, which is significantly shorter.