Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU | XFX $49999 |  $41690 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1900 MHz | 1320 MHz |
Boost Clock | 3320 MHz | 1807 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 5.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 2 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 2048 | 3584 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 0 | 2 |
DisplayPort 2.1a Outputs | 2 | 0 |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | GSYNC |
GPU | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB | GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 2 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 2 |
Bus | - | PCIe x16 |
Length | 270 mm | 198 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 20 Gbps | - |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 1 | 0 |
Series | Radeon RX 9000 | GeForce RTX 30 |
Slot Size | 3 | 2 |
TDP | 160W | 170W |
Upscaling | FSR 4 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Part Number | RX-96TSW16BQ | GV-N3060GAMING OC-8GD |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Swift OC vs GAMING OC reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The GAMING OC is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $83 (20%) less than the Swift OC.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Swift OC has the advantage with 8GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the GAMING OC, which is significantly shorter.