Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU | XFX $49999 | XFX $35999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1900 MHz | 2150 MHz |
Boost Clock | 3320 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 5.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 2 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 2048 | 2560 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 0 | 3 |
DisplayPort 2.1a Outputs | 2 | 0 |
Frame Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync |
GPU | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 1 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 1 | 1 |
Bus | - | PCIe x16 |
Length | 270 mm | 323 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 20 Gbps | 18 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 1 | 0 |
Series | Radeon RX 9000 | Radeon RX 6000 |
Slot Size | 3 | 3 |
TDP | 160W | 250W |
Upscaling | FSR 4 | FSR 3.1 |
VRAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
Part Number | RX-96TSW16BQ | RX-675XYJFDP |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Swift OC vs Speedster QICK 319 Core reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Speedster QICK 319 Core is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $140 (39%) less than the Swift OC.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Swift OC has the advantage with 4GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the Swift OC, which is significantly shorter.