Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $79500 |  $46999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1515 MHz | 2220 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1860 MHz | 3230 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | AIO | 2 Fans |
CUDA Cores | - | 2048 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 0 |
DisplayPort 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 2 |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | FreeSync |
GPU | GeForce RTX 2080 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 0 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 268 mm | 200 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 7 Gbps | - |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
PCIe 6-Pin | 1 | 0 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 1 | 0 |
Series | GeForce RTX 20 | Radeon RX 9000 |
Slot Size | 2 | 2 |
TDP | 215W | 160W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | FSR 4 |
VRAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Part Number | GeForce RTX 2080 SEA HAWK X G2080SHX RTX 2080 SEA HAWK X V372-008R | RX9060XT 16G-A |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the SEA HAWK X vs Reaper reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Reaper is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $325 (69%) less than the SEA HAWK X.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the Reaper has the advantage with 8GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the Reaper, which is significantly shorter.