Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $2,38900 |  $1,99999 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1395 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | - |
Cooling | 240 mm Radiator | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 10496 | 10496 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 3 |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | GSYNC |
GPU | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 3090 |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 3 | 2 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 252 mm | 300 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 20 Gbps | 20 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
PCIe 8-Pin | 2 | 0 |
Series | GeForce RTX 30 | GeForce RTX 30 |
Slot Size | 2 | 3 |
TDP | 350W | 350W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 24 GB | 24 GB |
Part Number | GV-N3090AORUSX W24GD | TUF-RTX3090-O24G-GAMING 90YV0FD1-M0NM00 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the AORUS XTREME WATERFORCE vs TUF GAMING OC reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The TUF GAMING OC is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $389 (19%) less than the AORUS XTREME WATERFORCE.
Builders with compact cases should consider the AORUS XTREME WATERFORCE, which is significantly shorter.