Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $1,23999 | $1,24900 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1050 MHz | 2310 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 2610 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 1 Fan | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 0 | 7680 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 4 | 3 |
Frame Gen | - | DLSS Frame Generation |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | GSYNC |
GPU | RTX A4500 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 0 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 332 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 16 Gbps | - |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
PCIe 8-Pin | 1 | 0 |
Series | RTX A4500 | GeForce RTX 40 |
Slot Size | 2 | 4 |
TDP | 200W | 285W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 20 GB | 12 GB |
Part Number | VCNRTXA4500-PB | VCG4070T12TFXXPB1 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the RTX A4500 vs XLR8 Gaming VERTO EPIC-X reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
Both components are priced similarly, making the choice dependent on specific features rather than budget.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the RTX A4500 has the advantage with 8GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the RTX A4500, which is significantly shorter.