Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU | ![]() $79860 | ![]() $1,88236 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 1500 MHz | 2235 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2520 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | Grey |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 5888 | 16384 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 1 |
Frame Gen | - | DLSS Frame Generation |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | GSYNC |
GPU | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
HDMI 2.0 Outputs | 1 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 0 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 0 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 294 mm | 329 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | 14 Gbps | - |
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
PCIe 12VHPWR | 0 | 1 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 2 | 0 |
Series | GeForce RTX 30 | GeForce RTX 40 |
Slot Size | 3 | 4 |
TDP | 220W | 450W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Part Number | NE63070019P2-1041A | NED4090019SB-1020G |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the GamingPro vs GameRock reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The GamingPro is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $1084 (136%) less than the GameRock.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the GameRock has the advantage with 16GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the GamingPro, which is significantly shorter.
