Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $3,14995 |  $2,72299 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2235 MHz | 1855 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2595 MHz | 2499 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
Color | Black | Black |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 1 Fan |
CUDA Cores | 16384 | 0 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 0 |
DisplayPort 2.1 Outputs | 0 | 3 |
Frame Gen | DLSS Frame Generation | - |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | FreeSync |
GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 2 | 0 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 2 | 0 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 326 mm | 280 mm |
Memory Bandwidth | - | 18 Gbps |
Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
PCIe 8-Pin | 0 | 2 |
Series | GeForce RTX 40 | Radeon PRO W7800 |
Slot Size | 4 | 2 |
TDP | 450W | 260W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | - |
VRAM | 24 GB | 32 GB |
Part Number | TUF-RTX4090-O24G-OG-GAMING 90YV0IY3-M0NA00 | 100-300000075 |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the TUF GAMING OG OC vs 100-300000075 reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The 100-300000075 is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $427 (16%) less than the TUF GAMING OG OC.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the 100-300000075 has the advantage with 8GB more VRAM.
Builders with compact cases should consider the 100-300000075, which is significantly shorter.