Compare GPUs
Share Comparison
| GPU |  $3,14995 |  $2,51298 |
|---|---|---|
Base Clock | 2235 MHz | 2010 MHz |
Boost Clock | 2595 MHz | 2422 MHz |
Bus | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
Chipset Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
Color | Black | White |
Cooling | 3 Fans | 3 Fans |
CUDA Cores | 16384 | 21760 |
DisplayPort 1.4a Outputs | 3 | 0 |
DisplayPort 2.1 Outputs | 0 | 3 |
Frame Gen | DLSS Frame Generation | DLSS Multi Frame Generation |
Frame Sync | GSYNC | GSYNC |
GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
HDMI 2.1a Outputs | 2 | 1 |
HDMI 2.1b Outputs | 2 | 1 |
Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
Length | 326 mm | 330 mm |
Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR7 |
Series | GeForce RTX 40 | GeForce RTX 50 |
Slot Size | 4 | 4 |
TDP | 450W | 575W |
Upscaling | DLSS 4.5 | DLSS 4.5 |
VRAM | 24 GB | 32 GB |
Part Number | TUF-RTX4090-O24G-OG-GAMING 90YV0IY3-M0NA00 | ZT-B50900Q-10P |
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the TUF GAMING OG OC vs GAMING SOLID OC reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The GAMING SOLID OC is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $637 (25%) less than the TUF GAMING OG OC.
For high-resolution textures and creative workloads, the GAMING SOLID OC has the advantage with 8GB more VRAM.