Compare CPUs
Share Comparison
| CPU | ![]() $48400 | ![]() $33000 |
|---|---|---|
Core Count | 8 | 24 (8P+16E) |
Thread Count | 16 | 24 |
Performance-cores | 8 | 8 |
Efficient-cores | 0 | 16 |
TDP | 120W | 125W |
Boost TDP | 0W | 250W |
Base Clock | 4.7 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Boost Clock | 5.6 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
Cooler Included | No | No |
Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
ECC Memory Support | Yes | Yes |
Integrated Graphics | AMD Radeon | Intel Xe Graphics |
L2 Cache | 8 MB | 40 MB |
L3 Cache | 96 MB | - |
Manufacturer Specs | AMD's Site | Intel's Site |
Microarchitecture | Zen 5 | Arrow Lake Refresh |
Series | Ryzen 7 | Core Ultra 7 |
Socket | AM5 | LGA1851 |
Memory Supported | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Verified | ||
Comparison Analysis
Comparing the Ryzen 7 9850X3D vs Core Ultra 7 270K Plus reveals distinct differences in their targeted use cases.
The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is the more budget-friendly option, costing approximately $154 (47%) less than the Ryzen 7 9850X3D.
The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus features a higher core count, making it better suited for multitasking and heavy productivity workloads.
Note that these CPUs use different sockets (AM5 vs LGA1851), so they require different motherboards.

